Diego Andres Nino Estupinan vs Alberto Piraquive
2017 · Result 0–1 · Caro-Kann Defense: Exchange Variation (B13).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Diego Andres Nino Estupinan vs Alberto Piraquive with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Diego Andres Nino Estupinan (1531)
- Black
- Alberto Piraquive (1867)
- Result
- 0–1
- Year
- 2017
- Opening
- Caro-Kann Defense: Exchange Variation (B13)
About this chess game
This chess game between Diego Andres Nino Estupinan (1531) and Alberto Piraquive (1867) was played in 2017 and finished 0–1. The opening was the Caro-Kann Defense: Exchange Variation (B13). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Diego Andres Nino Estupinan games or Alberto Piraquive games? This Diego Andres Nino Estupinan vs Alberto Piraquive encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Caro-Kann Defense: Exchange Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Diego Andres Nino Estupinan vs Alberto Piraquive?
Diego Andres Nino Estupinan vs Alberto Piraquive (2017) finished 0–1, a win for Alberto Piraquive.
What opening was played in Diego Andres Nino Estupinan vs Alberto Piraquive?
The game opened with the Caro-Kann Defense: Exchange Variation (ECO B13).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Diego Andres Nino Estupinan vs Alberto Piraquive, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.