Mark Nieuweboer vs Miloslav Baciak
CL/2010/C2, 2010 · Result 1–0 · Nimzo-Indian Defense: Normal Variation, Botvinnik System (E49).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Mark Nieuweboer vs Miloslav Baciak with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Mark Nieuweboer (1462)
- Black
- Miloslav Baciak (1974)
- Result
- 1–0
- Event
- CL/2010/C2
- Year
- 2010
- Opening
- Nimzo-Indian Defense: Normal Variation, Botvinnik System (E49)
About this chess game
This chess game between Mark Nieuweboer (1462) and Miloslav Baciak (1974) was played at CL/2010/C2 in 2010 and finished 1–0. The opening was the Nimzo-Indian Defense: Normal Variation, Botvinnik System (E49). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Mark Nieuweboer games or Miloslav Baciak games? This Mark Nieuweboer vs Miloslav Baciak encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Nimzo-Indian Defense: Normal Variation, Botvinnik System.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Mark Nieuweboer vs Miloslav Baciak?
Mark Nieuweboer vs Miloslav Baciak (2010) finished 1–0, a win for Mark Nieuweboer.
What opening was played in Mark Nieuweboer vs Miloslav Baciak?
The game opened with the Nimzo-Indian Defense: Normal Variation, Botvinnik System (ECO E49).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Mark Nieuweboer vs Miloslav Baciak, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.