Peter Niese vs Eugen Löschnauer
AUT/MT-Rado/1-1 (AUT), 2010 · Result ½–½ · English Opening: Symmetrical Variation, Normal Variation (A34).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Peter Niese vs Eugen Löschnauer with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Peter Niese (2335)
- Black
- Eugen Löschnauer (1614)
- Result
- ½–½
- Event
- AUT/MT-Rado/1-1 (AUT)
- Year
- 2010
- Opening
- English Opening: Symmetrical Variation, Normal Variation (A34)
About this chess game
This chess game between Peter Niese (2335) and Eugen Löschnauer (1614) was played at AUT/MT-Rado/1-1 (AUT) in 2010 and finished ½–½. The opening was the English Opening: Symmetrical Variation, Normal Variation (A34). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Peter Niese games or Eugen Löschnauer games? This Peter Niese vs Eugen Löschnauer encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the English Opening: Symmetrical Variation, Normal Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Peter Niese vs Eugen Löschnauer?
Peter Niese vs Eugen Löschnauer (2010) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Peter Niese vs Eugen Löschnauer?
The game opened with the English Opening: Symmetrical Variation, Normal Variation (ECO A34).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Peter Niese vs Eugen Löschnauer, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.