Tristan Nicolas vs Jean-Loup Mercier
2009 · Result 0–1 · Queen's Gambit Accepted: Normal Variation, Traditional System (D26).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Tristan Nicolas vs Jean-Loup Mercier with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Tristan Nicolas (1936)
- Black
- Jean-Loup Mercier (1889)
- Result
- 0–1
- Year
- 2009
- Opening
- Queen's Gambit Accepted: Normal Variation, Traditional System (D26)
About this chess game
This chess game between Tristan Nicolas (1936) and Jean-Loup Mercier (1889) was played in 2009 and finished 0–1. The opening was the Queen's Gambit Accepted: Normal Variation, Traditional System (D26). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Tristan Nicolas games or Jean-Loup Mercier games? This Tristan Nicolas vs Jean-Loup Mercier encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Queen's Gambit Accepted: Normal Variation, Traditional System.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Tristan Nicolas vs Jean-Loup Mercier?
Tristan Nicolas vs Jean-Loup Mercier (2009) finished 0–1, a win for Jean-Loup Mercier.
What opening was played in Tristan Nicolas vs Jean-Loup Mercier?
The game opened with the Queen's Gambit Accepted: Normal Variation, Traditional System (ECO D26).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Tristan Nicolas vs Jean-Loup Mercier, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.