Thien Viet Nguyen vs Cong Minh Pham
2016 · Result ½–½ · Queen's Gambit Declined: Exchange Variation, Reshevsky Variation (D36).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Thien Viet Nguyen vs Cong Minh Pham with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Thien Viet Nguyen (2290)
- Black
- Cong Minh Pham (1864)
- Result
- ½–½
- Year
- 2016
- Opening
- Queen's Gambit Declined: Exchange Variation, Reshevsky Variation (D36)
About this chess game
This chess game between Thien Viet Nguyen (2290) and Cong Minh Pham (1864) was played in 2016 and finished ½–½. The opening was the Queen's Gambit Declined: Exchange Variation, Reshevsky Variation (D36). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Thien Viet Nguyen games or Cong Minh Pham games? This Thien Viet Nguyen vs Cong Minh Pham encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Queen's Gambit Declined: Exchange Variation, Reshevsky Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Thien Viet Nguyen vs Cong Minh Pham?
Thien Viet Nguyen vs Cong Minh Pham (2016) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Thien Viet Nguyen vs Cong Minh Pham?
The game opened with the Queen's Gambit Declined: Exchange Variation, Reshevsky Variation (ECO D36).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Thien Viet Nguyen vs Cong Minh Pham, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.