Ha Phuong Nguyen vs Van Thanh Nguyen
Ho Chi Minh VIE, Team Ch (m) 2013, 2013 · Result 0–1 · Queen's Indian Defense: Spassky System (E14).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Ha Phuong Nguyen vs Van Thanh Nguyen with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Ha Phuong Nguyen (2026)
- Black
- Van Thanh Nguyen (2194)
- Result
- 0–1
- Event
- Ho Chi Minh VIE, Team Ch (m) 2013
- Year
- 2013
- Opening
- Queen's Indian Defense: Spassky System (E14)
About this chess game
This chess game between Ha Phuong Nguyen (2026) and Van Thanh Nguyen (2194) was played at Ho Chi Minh VIE, Team Ch (m) 2013 in 2013 and finished 0–1. The opening was the Queen's Indian Defense: Spassky System (E14). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Ha Phuong Nguyen games or Van Thanh Nguyen games? This Ha Phuong Nguyen vs Van Thanh Nguyen encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Queen's Indian Defense: Spassky System.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Ha Phuong Nguyen vs Van Thanh Nguyen?
Ha Phuong Nguyen vs Van Thanh Nguyen (2013) finished 0–1, a win for Van Thanh Nguyen.
What opening was played in Ha Phuong Nguyen vs Van Thanh Nguyen?
The game opened with the Queen's Indian Defense: Spassky System (ECO E14).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Ha Phuong Nguyen vs Van Thanh Nguyen, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.