Tri Thien Nguyen vs Tupfah Khumnorkaew
2012 · Result ½–½ · Sicilian Defense: Accelerated Dragon, Modern Bc4 Variation (B35).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Tri Thien Nguyen vs Tupfah Khumnorkaew with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Tri Thien Nguyen (1704)
- Black
- Tupfah Khumnorkaew (1884)
- Result
- ½–½
- Year
- 2012
- Opening
- Sicilian Defense: Accelerated Dragon, Modern Bc4 Variation (B35)
About this chess game
This chess game between Tri Thien Nguyen (1704) and Tupfah Khumnorkaew (1884) was played in 2012 and finished ½–½. The opening was the Sicilian Defense: Accelerated Dragon, Modern Bc4 Variation (B35). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Tri Thien Nguyen games or Tupfah Khumnorkaew games? This Tri Thien Nguyen vs Tupfah Khumnorkaew encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Sicilian Defense: Accelerated Dragon, Modern Bc4 Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Tri Thien Nguyen vs Tupfah Khumnorkaew?
Tri Thien Nguyen vs Tupfah Khumnorkaew (2012) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Tri Thien Nguyen vs Tupfah Khumnorkaew?
The game opened with the Sicilian Defense: Accelerated Dragon, Modern Bc4 Variation (ECO B35).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Tri Thien Nguyen vs Tupfah Khumnorkaew, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.