Quang Nhat Ngo vs Mai Duc Tri Nguyen
date unknown · Result 0–1 · Italian Game: Two Knights Defense, Polerio Defense, Suhle Defense (C59).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Quang Nhat Ngo vs Mai Duc Tri Nguyen with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Quang Nhat Ngo (1784)
- Black
- Mai Duc Tri Nguyen (1949)
- Result
- 0–1
- Opening
- Italian Game: Two Knights Defense, Polerio Defense, Suhle Defense (C59)
About this chess game
This chess game between Quang Nhat Ngo (1784) and Mai Duc Tri Nguyen (1949) was played and finished 0–1. The opening was the Italian Game: Two Knights Defense, Polerio Defense, Suhle Defense (C59). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Quang Nhat Ngo games or Mai Duc Tri Nguyen games? This Quang Nhat Ngo vs Mai Duc Tri Nguyen encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Italian Game: Two Knights Defense, Polerio Defense, Suhle Defense.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Quang Nhat Ngo vs Mai Duc Tri Nguyen?
Quang Nhat Ngo vs Mai Duc Tri Nguyen finished 0–1, a win for Mai Duc Tri Nguyen.
What opening was played in Quang Nhat Ngo vs Mai Duc Tri Nguyen?
The game opened with the Italian Game: Two Knights Defense, Polerio Defense, Suhle Defense (ECO C59).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Quang Nhat Ngo vs Mai Duc Tri Nguyen, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.