Petr Neuman vs Oleg Korneev
24. Staufer-Open, 2012 · Result ½–½ · English Opening: King's English Variation, Reversed Closed Sicilian (A25).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Petr Neuman vs Oleg Korneev with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Petr Neuman (2459)
- Black
- Oleg Korneev (2584)
- Result
- ½–½
- Event
- 24. Staufer-Open
- Year
- 2012
- Opening
- English Opening: King's English Variation, Reversed Closed Sicilian (A25)
About this chess game
This chess game between Petr Neuman (2459) and Oleg Korneev (2584) was played at 24. Staufer-Open in 2012 and finished ½–½. The opening was the English Opening: King's English Variation, Reversed Closed Sicilian (A25). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Petr Neuman games or Oleg Korneev games? This Petr Neuman vs Oleg Korneev encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the English Opening: King's English Variation, Reversed Closed Sicilian.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Petr Neuman vs Oleg Korneev?
Petr Neuman vs Oleg Korneev (2012) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Petr Neuman vs Oleg Korneev?
The game opened with the English Opening: King's English Variation, Reversed Closed Sicilian (ECO A25).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Petr Neuman vs Oleg Korneev, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.