Ruslan Nemkin vs Mansur Gilmanov
RUS Ch U10 Serpukhov, date unknown · Result 0–1 · King's Indian Defense: Orthodox Variation, Positional Defense (E94).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Ruslan Nemkin vs Mansur Gilmanov with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Ruslan Nemkin
- Black
- Mansur Gilmanov (2065)
- Result
- 0–1
- Event
- RUS Ch U10 Serpukhov
- Opening
- King's Indian Defense: Orthodox Variation, Positional Defense (E94)
About this chess game
This chess game between Ruslan Nemkin and Mansur Gilmanov (2065) was played at RUS Ch U10 Serpukhov and finished 0–1. The opening was the King's Indian Defense: Orthodox Variation, Positional Defense (E94). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Ruslan Nemkin games or Mansur Gilmanov games? This Ruslan Nemkin vs Mansur Gilmanov encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the King's Indian Defense: Orthodox Variation, Positional Defense.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Ruslan Nemkin vs Mansur Gilmanov?
Ruslan Nemkin vs Mansur Gilmanov finished 0–1, a win for Mansur Gilmanov.
What opening was played in Ruslan Nemkin vs Mansur Gilmanov?
The game opened with the King's Indian Defense: Orthodox Variation, Positional Defense (ECO E94).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Ruslan Nemkin vs Mansur Gilmanov, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.