Rastislav Nemeckay vs Sebastian Lukas Kostolansky
2017 · Result 0–1 · French Defense: Advance Variation (C02).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Rastislav Nemeckay vs Sebastian Lukas Kostolansky with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Rastislav Nemeckay (1990)
- Black
- Sebastian Lukas Kostolansky (2083)
- Result
- 0–1
- Year
- 2017
- Opening
- French Defense: Advance Variation (C02)
About this chess game
This chess game between Rastislav Nemeckay (1990) and Sebastian Lukas Kostolansky (2083) was played in 2017 and finished 0–1. The opening was the French Defense: Advance Variation (C02). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Rastislav Nemeckay games or Sebastian Lukas Kostolansky games? This Rastislav Nemeckay vs Sebastian Lukas Kostolansky encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the French Defense: Advance Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Rastislav Nemeckay vs Sebastian Lukas Kostolansky?
Rastislav Nemeckay vs Sebastian Lukas Kostolansky (2017) finished 0–1, a win for Sebastian Lukas Kostolansky.
What opening was played in Rastislav Nemeckay vs Sebastian Lukas Kostolansky?
The game opened with the French Defense: Advance Variation (ECO C02).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Rastislav Nemeckay vs Sebastian Lukas Kostolansky, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.