Oscar Roberto Neira vs David Alejandro Vargas Diaz
2018 · Result 0–1 · Sicilian Defense: Kan Variation (B41).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Oscar Roberto Neira vs David Alejandro Vargas Diaz with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Oscar Roberto Neira (1874)
- Black
- David Alejandro Vargas Diaz (1909)
- Result
- 0–1
- Year
- 2018
- Opening
- Sicilian Defense: Kan Variation (B41)
About this chess game
This chess game between Oscar Roberto Neira (1874) and David Alejandro Vargas Diaz (1909) was played in 2018 and finished 0–1. The opening was the Sicilian Defense: Kan Variation (B41). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Oscar Roberto Neira games or David Alejandro Vargas Diaz games? This Oscar Roberto Neira vs David Alejandro Vargas Diaz encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Sicilian Defense: Kan Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Oscar Roberto Neira vs David Alejandro Vargas Diaz?
Oscar Roberto Neira vs David Alejandro Vargas Diaz (2018) finished 0–1, a win for David Alejandro Vargas Diaz.
What opening was played in Oscar Roberto Neira vs David Alejandro Vargas Diaz?
The game opened with the Sicilian Defense: Kan Variation (ECO B41).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Oscar Roberto Neira vs David Alejandro Vargas Diaz, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.