Hans-Joachim Neese vs Klemens Ranker
2015 · Result ½–½ · Grünfeld Defense: Three Knights Variation, Hungarian Variation (D93).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Hans-Joachim Neese vs Klemens Ranker with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Hans-Joachim Neese (2175)
- Black
- Klemens Ranker (1864)
- Result
- ½–½
- Year
- 2015
- Opening
- Grünfeld Defense: Three Knights Variation, Hungarian Variation (D93)
About this chess game
This chess game between Hans-Joachim Neese (2175) and Klemens Ranker (1864) was played in 2015 and finished ½–½. The opening was the Grünfeld Defense: Three Knights Variation, Hungarian Variation (D93). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Hans-Joachim Neese games or Klemens Ranker games? This Hans-Joachim Neese vs Klemens Ranker encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Grünfeld Defense: Three Knights Variation, Hungarian Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Hans-Joachim Neese vs Klemens Ranker?
Hans-Joachim Neese vs Klemens Ranker (2015) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Hans-Joachim Neese vs Klemens Ranker?
The game opened with the Grünfeld Defense: Three Knights Variation, Hungarian Variation (ECO D93).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Hans-Joachim Neese vs Klemens Ranker, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.