Manuel Navio Lopez vs Leonid Lisac
Lanzarote Open 2018, 2018 · Result 1–0 · Modern Defense: Averbakh Variation, Pseudo-Sämisch (A42).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Manuel Navio Lopez vs Leonid Lisac with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Manuel Navio Lopez (1918)
- Black
- Leonid Lisac (1691)
- Result
- 1–0
- Event
- Lanzarote Open 2018
- Year
- 2018
- Opening
- Modern Defense: Averbakh Variation, Pseudo-Sämisch (A42)
About this chess game
This chess game between Manuel Navio Lopez (1918) and Leonid Lisac (1691) was played at Lanzarote Open 2018 in 2018 and finished 1–0. The opening was the Modern Defense: Averbakh Variation, Pseudo-Sämisch (A42). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Manuel Navio Lopez games or Leonid Lisac games? This Manuel Navio Lopez vs Leonid Lisac encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Modern Defense: Averbakh Variation, Pseudo-Sämisch.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Manuel Navio Lopez vs Leonid Lisac?
Manuel Navio Lopez vs Leonid Lisac (2018) finished 1–0, a win for Manuel Navio Lopez.
What opening was played in Manuel Navio Lopez vs Leonid Lisac?
The game opened with the Modern Defense: Averbakh Variation, Pseudo-Sämisch (ECO A42).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Manuel Navio Lopez vs Leonid Lisac, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.