Gabriel Ricardo Salim Name vs Alvaro Jr Potasso
2002 · Result 1–0 · Queen's Gambit Declined: Ragozin Defense (D38).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Gabriel Ricardo Salim Name vs Alvaro Jr Potasso with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Gabriel Ricardo Salim Name (2218)
- Black
- Alvaro Jr Potasso
- Result
- 1–0
- Year
- 2002
- Opening
- Queen's Gambit Declined: Ragozin Defense (D38)
About this chess game
This chess game between Gabriel Ricardo Salim Name (2218) and Alvaro Jr Potasso was played in 2002 and finished 1–0. The opening was the Queen's Gambit Declined: Ragozin Defense (D38). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Gabriel Ricardo Salim Name games or Alvaro Jr Potasso games? This Gabriel Ricardo Salim Name vs Alvaro Jr Potasso encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Queen's Gambit Declined: Ragozin Defense.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Gabriel Ricardo Salim Name vs Alvaro Jr Potasso?
Gabriel Ricardo Salim Name vs Alvaro Jr Potasso (2002) finished 1–0, a win for Gabriel Ricardo Salim Name.
What opening was played in Gabriel Ricardo Salim Name vs Alvaro Jr Potasso?
The game opened with the Queen's Gambit Declined: Ragozin Defense (ECO D38).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Gabriel Ricardo Salim Name vs Alvaro Jr Potasso, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.