Herbert Nagel vs Lars-Henrik Bech Hansen
EU/C2015/pr.17, 2015 · Result 0–1 · King's Indian Attack: Sicilian Variation (A08).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Herbert Nagel vs Lars-Henrik Bech Hansen with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Herbert Nagel (2082)
- Black
- Lars-Henrik Bech Hansen (1993)
- Result
- 0–1
- Event
- EU/C2015/pr.17
- Year
- 2015
- Opening
- King's Indian Attack: Sicilian Variation (A08)
About this chess game
This chess game between Herbert Nagel (2082) and Lars-Henrik Bech Hansen (1993) was played at EU/C2015/pr.17 in 2015 and finished 0–1. The opening was the King's Indian Attack: Sicilian Variation (A08). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Herbert Nagel games or Lars-Henrik Bech Hansen games? This Herbert Nagel vs Lars-Henrik Bech Hansen encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the King's Indian Attack: Sicilian Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Herbert Nagel vs Lars-Henrik Bech Hansen?
Herbert Nagel vs Lars-Henrik Bech Hansen (2015) finished 0–1, a win for Lars-Henrik Bech Hansen.
What opening was played in Herbert Nagel vs Lars-Henrik Bech Hansen?
The game opened with the King's Indian Attack: Sicilian Variation (ECO A08).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Herbert Nagel vs Lars-Henrik Bech Hansen, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.