Burkhard Naeter vs George E Hollands
DE15A pr 17, 2021 · Result ½–½ · French Defense: Winawer Variation, Advance Variation (C18).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Burkhard Naeter vs George E Hollands with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Burkhard Naeter (1655)
- Black
- George E Hollands (1822)
- Result
- ½–½
- Event
- DE15A pr 17
- Year
- 2021
- Opening
- French Defense: Winawer Variation, Advance Variation (C18)
About this chess game
This chess game between Burkhard Naeter (1655) and George E Hollands (1822) was played at DE15A pr 17 in 2021 and finished ½–½. The opening was the French Defense: Winawer Variation, Advance Variation (C18). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Burkhard Naeter games or George E Hollands games? This Burkhard Naeter vs George E Hollands encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the French Defense: Winawer Variation, Advance Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Burkhard Naeter vs George E Hollands?
Burkhard Naeter vs George E Hollands (2021) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Burkhard Naeter vs George E Hollands?
The game opened with the French Defense: Winawer Variation, Advance Variation (ECO C18).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Burkhard Naeter vs George E Hollands, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.