Mohmmad Javad Naderi vs Farshad Samareh Shahpasand
2015 · Result ½–½ · Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation (B22).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Mohmmad Javad Naderi vs Farshad Samareh Shahpasand with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Mohmmad Javad Naderi (2193)
- Black
- Farshad Samareh Shahpasand (2079)
- Result
- ½–½
- Year
- 2015
- Opening
- Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation (B22)
About this chess game
This chess game between Mohmmad Javad Naderi (2193) and Farshad Samareh Shahpasand (2079) was played in 2015 and finished ½–½. The opening was the Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation (B22). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Mohmmad Javad Naderi games or Farshad Samareh Shahpasand games? This Mohmmad Javad Naderi vs Farshad Samareh Shahpasand encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Mohmmad Javad Naderi vs Farshad Samareh Shahpasand?
Mohmmad Javad Naderi vs Farshad Samareh Shahpasand (2015) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Mohmmad Javad Naderi vs Farshad Samareh Shahpasand?
The game opened with the Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation (ECO B22).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Mohmmad Javad Naderi vs Farshad Samareh Shahpasand, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.