Ricard Nadal Fajardo vs Jose Alberto Robles Diaz
2018 · Result ½–½ · English Opening: Symmetrical Variation (A30).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Ricard Nadal Fajardo vs Jose Alberto Robles Diaz with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Ricard Nadal Fajardo (1926)
- Black
- Jose Alberto Robles Diaz (2118)
- Result
- ½–½
- Year
- 2018
- Opening
- English Opening: Symmetrical Variation (A30)
About this chess game
This chess game between Ricard Nadal Fajardo (1926) and Jose Alberto Robles Diaz (2118) was played in 2018 and finished ½–½. The opening was the English Opening: Symmetrical Variation (A30). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Ricard Nadal Fajardo games or Jose Alberto Robles Diaz games? This Ricard Nadal Fajardo vs Jose Alberto Robles Diaz encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the English Opening: Symmetrical Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Ricard Nadal Fajardo vs Jose Alberto Robles Diaz?
Ricard Nadal Fajardo vs Jose Alberto Robles Diaz (2018) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Ricard Nadal Fajardo vs Jose Alberto Robles Diaz?
The game opened with the English Opening: Symmetrical Variation (ECO A30).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Ricard Nadal Fajardo vs Jose Alberto Robles Diaz, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.