Benjamin Nachbar vs Ronald De Pooter
20. HZ Open 2016, 2016 · Result 1–0 · Queen's Gambit Declined: Orthodox Defense, Rubinstein Variation (D61).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Benjamin Nachbar vs Ronald De Pooter with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Benjamin Nachbar (2124)
- Black
- Ronald De Pooter (1761)
- Result
- 1–0
- Event
- 20. HZ Open 2016
- Year
- 2016
- Opening
- Queen's Gambit Declined: Orthodox Defense, Rubinstein Variation (D61)
About this chess game
This chess game between Benjamin Nachbar (2124) and Ronald De Pooter (1761) was played at 20. HZ Open 2016 in 2016 and finished 1–0. The opening was the Queen's Gambit Declined: Orthodox Defense, Rubinstein Variation (D61). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Benjamin Nachbar games or Ronald De Pooter games? This Benjamin Nachbar vs Ronald De Pooter encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Queen's Gambit Declined: Orthodox Defense, Rubinstein Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Benjamin Nachbar vs Ronald De Pooter?
Benjamin Nachbar vs Ronald De Pooter (2016) finished 1–0, a win for Benjamin Nachbar.
What opening was played in Benjamin Nachbar vs Ronald De Pooter?
The game opened with the Queen's Gambit Declined: Orthodox Defense, Rubinstein Variation (ECO D61).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Benjamin Nachbar vs Ronald De Pooter, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.