Daniel Mutis Medina vs Francisco Camacho Hernandez
2019 · Result 0–1 · Grünfeld Defense: Flohr Defense (D94).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Daniel Mutis Medina vs Francisco Camacho Hernandez with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Daniel Mutis Medina (2127)
- Black
- Francisco Camacho Hernandez (1781)
- Result
- 0–1
- Year
- 2019
- Opening
- Grünfeld Defense: Flohr Defense (D94)
About this chess game
This chess game between Daniel Mutis Medina (2127) and Francisco Camacho Hernandez (1781) was played in 2019 and finished 0–1. The opening was the Grünfeld Defense: Flohr Defense (D94). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Daniel Mutis Medina games or Francisco Camacho Hernandez games? This Daniel Mutis Medina vs Francisco Camacho Hernandez encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Grünfeld Defense: Flohr Defense.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Daniel Mutis Medina vs Francisco Camacho Hernandez?
Daniel Mutis Medina vs Francisco Camacho Hernandez (2019) finished 0–1, a win for Francisco Camacho Hernandez.
What opening was played in Daniel Mutis Medina vs Francisco Camacho Hernandez?
The game opened with the Grünfeld Defense: Flohr Defense (ECO D94).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Daniel Mutis Medina vs Francisco Camacho Hernandez, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.