Guillem Joan Mut Company vs Guillem Porta Tovar
2013 · Result ½–½ · King's Indian Defense: Four Pawns Attack (E76).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Guillem Joan Mut Company vs Guillem Porta Tovar with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Guillem Joan Mut Company (1910)
- Black
- Guillem Porta Tovar (1958)
- Result
- ½–½
- Year
- 2013
- Opening
- King's Indian Defense: Four Pawns Attack (E76)
About this chess game
This chess game between Guillem Joan Mut Company (1910) and Guillem Porta Tovar (1958) was played in 2013 and finished ½–½. The opening was the King's Indian Defense: Four Pawns Attack (E76). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Guillem Joan Mut Company games or Guillem Porta Tovar games? This Guillem Joan Mut Company vs Guillem Porta Tovar encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the King's Indian Defense: Four Pawns Attack.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Guillem Joan Mut Company vs Guillem Porta Tovar?
Guillem Joan Mut Company vs Guillem Porta Tovar (2013) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Guillem Joan Mut Company vs Guillem Porta Tovar?
The game opened with the King's Indian Defense: Four Pawns Attack (ECO E76).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Guillem Joan Mut Company vs Guillem Porta Tovar, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.