Diego Mussanti vs Daniel Guillermo Farace
44. Marcel Duchamp, 2013 · Result 1–0 · French Defense: Winawer Variation, Advance Variation (C16).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Diego Mussanti vs Daniel Guillermo Farace with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Diego Mussanti (2314)
- Black
- Daniel Guillermo Farace (1876)
- Result
- 1–0
- Event
- 44. Marcel Duchamp
- Year
- 2013
- Opening
- French Defense: Winawer Variation, Advance Variation (C16)
About this chess game
This chess game between Diego Mussanti (2314) and Daniel Guillermo Farace (1876) was played at 44. Marcel Duchamp in 2013 and finished 1–0. The opening was the French Defense: Winawer Variation, Advance Variation (C16). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Diego Mussanti games or Daniel Guillermo Farace games? This Diego Mussanti vs Daniel Guillermo Farace encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the French Defense: Winawer Variation, Advance Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Diego Mussanti vs Daniel Guillermo Farace?
Diego Mussanti vs Daniel Guillermo Farace (2013) finished 1–0, a win for Diego Mussanti.
What opening was played in Diego Mussanti vs Daniel Guillermo Farace?
The game opened with the French Defense: Winawer Variation, Advance Variation (ECO C16).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Diego Mussanti vs Daniel Guillermo Farace, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.