Benedikt Muschik vs Thorsten Michael Haub
2013 · Result ½–½ · Dutch Defense: Leningrad Variation, Warsaw Variation (A88).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Benedikt Muschik vs Thorsten Michael Haub with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Benedikt Muschik (2329)
- Black
- Thorsten Michael Haub (2458)
- Result
- ½–½
- Year
- 2013
- Opening
- Dutch Defense: Leningrad Variation, Warsaw Variation (A88)
About this chess game
This chess game between Benedikt Muschik (2329) and Thorsten Michael Haub (2458) was played in 2013 and finished ½–½. The opening was the Dutch Defense: Leningrad Variation, Warsaw Variation (A88). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Benedikt Muschik games or Thorsten Michael Haub games? This Benedikt Muschik vs Thorsten Michael Haub encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Dutch Defense: Leningrad Variation, Warsaw Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Benedikt Muschik vs Thorsten Michael Haub?
Benedikt Muschik vs Thorsten Michael Haub (2013) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Benedikt Muschik vs Thorsten Michael Haub?
The game opened with the Dutch Defense: Leningrad Variation, Warsaw Variation (ECO A88).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Benedikt Muschik vs Thorsten Michael Haub, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.