Ruslan Musalov vs David Paravyan
RUS Ch Blitz 2016, 2016 · Result 0–1 · Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation, Opocensky Variation (B92).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Ruslan Musalov vs David Paravyan with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Ruslan Musalov (2332)
- Black
- David Paravyan (2528)
- Result
- 0–1
- Event
- RUS Ch Blitz 2016
- Year
- 2016
- Opening
- Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation, Opocensky Variation (B92)
About this chess game
This chess game between Ruslan Musalov (2332) and David Paravyan (2528) was played at RUS Ch Blitz 2016 in 2016 and finished 0–1. The opening was the Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation, Opocensky Variation (B92). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Ruslan Musalov games or David Paravyan games? This Ruslan Musalov vs David Paravyan encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation, Opocensky Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Ruslan Musalov vs David Paravyan?
Ruslan Musalov vs David Paravyan (2016) finished 0–1, a win for David Paravyan.
What opening was played in Ruslan Musalov vs David Paravyan?
The game opened with the Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation, Opocensky Variation (ECO B92).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Ruslan Musalov vs David Paravyan, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.