Antonio Murciano Cespedosa vs Cristian Torres Sevilla
2010 · Result 0–1 · King's Indian Defense: Orthodox Variation (E92).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Antonio Murciano Cespedosa vs Cristian Torres Sevilla with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Antonio Murciano Cespedosa (1727)
- Black
- Cristian Torres Sevilla (1916)
- Result
- 0–1
- Year
- 2010
- Opening
- King's Indian Defense: Orthodox Variation (E92)
About this chess game
This chess game between Antonio Murciano Cespedosa (1727) and Cristian Torres Sevilla (1916) was played in 2010 and finished 0–1. The opening was the King's Indian Defense: Orthodox Variation (E92). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Antonio Murciano Cespedosa games or Cristian Torres Sevilla games? This Antonio Murciano Cespedosa vs Cristian Torres Sevilla encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the King's Indian Defense: Orthodox Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Antonio Murciano Cespedosa vs Cristian Torres Sevilla?
Antonio Murciano Cespedosa vs Cristian Torres Sevilla (2010) finished 0–1, a win for Cristian Torres Sevilla.
What opening was played in Antonio Murciano Cespedosa vs Cristian Torres Sevilla?
The game opened with the King's Indian Defense: Orthodox Variation (ECO E92).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Antonio Murciano Cespedosa vs Cristian Torres Sevilla, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.