Manuel Munoz Pelaez vs Adrian Ponce Cano
2012 · Result ½–½ · Sicilian Defense: Taimanov Variation, Normal Variation (B45).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Manuel Munoz Pelaez vs Adrian Ponce Cano with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Manuel Munoz Pelaez (1816)
- Black
- Adrian Ponce Cano (1958)
- Result
- ½–½
- Year
- 2012
- Opening
- Sicilian Defense: Taimanov Variation, Normal Variation (B45)
About this chess game
This chess game between Manuel Munoz Pelaez (1816) and Adrian Ponce Cano (1958) was played in 2012 and finished ½–½. The opening was the Sicilian Defense: Taimanov Variation, Normal Variation (B45). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Manuel Munoz Pelaez games or Adrian Ponce Cano games? This Manuel Munoz Pelaez vs Adrian Ponce Cano encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Sicilian Defense: Taimanov Variation, Normal Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Manuel Munoz Pelaez vs Adrian Ponce Cano?
Manuel Munoz Pelaez vs Adrian Ponce Cano (2012) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Manuel Munoz Pelaez vs Adrian Ponce Cano?
The game opened with the Sicilian Defense: Taimanov Variation, Normal Variation (ECO B45).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Manuel Munoz Pelaez vs Adrian Ponce Cano, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.