Jhon Edison Munoz Galvez vs Jorge Luis Castaneda
2016 · Result ½–½ · Caro-Kann Defense: Classical Variation (B18).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Jhon Edison Munoz Galvez vs Jorge Luis Castaneda with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Jhon Edison Munoz Galvez (2362)
- Black
- Jorge Luis Castaneda (2166)
- Result
- ½–½
- Year
- 2016
- Opening
- Caro-Kann Defense: Classical Variation (B18)
About this chess game
This chess game between Jhon Edison Munoz Galvez (2362) and Jorge Luis Castaneda (2166) was played in 2016 and finished ½–½. The opening was the Caro-Kann Defense: Classical Variation (B18). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Jhon Edison Munoz Galvez games or Jorge Luis Castaneda games? This Jhon Edison Munoz Galvez vs Jorge Luis Castaneda encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Caro-Kann Defense: Classical Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Jhon Edison Munoz Galvez vs Jorge Luis Castaneda?
Jhon Edison Munoz Galvez vs Jorge Luis Castaneda (2016) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Jhon Edison Munoz Galvez vs Jorge Luis Castaneda?
The game opened with the Caro-Kann Defense: Classical Variation (ECO B18).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Jhon Edison Munoz Galvez vs Jorge Luis Castaneda, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.