Ricardo Munoz Cebey vs Angel Marcos Garcia Ruiz Fuentes
2012 · Result ½–½ · Sicilian Defense: Closed (B26).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Ricardo Munoz Cebey vs Angel Marcos Garcia Ruiz Fuentes with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Ricardo Munoz Cebey (1961)
- Black
- Angel Marcos Garcia Ruiz Fuentes (1873)
- Result
- ½–½
- Year
- 2012
- Opening
- Sicilian Defense: Closed (B26)
About this chess game
This chess game between Ricardo Munoz Cebey (1961) and Angel Marcos Garcia Ruiz Fuentes (1873) was played in 2012 and finished ½–½. The opening was the Sicilian Defense: Closed (B26). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Ricardo Munoz Cebey games or Angel Marcos Garcia Ruiz Fuentes games? This Ricardo Munoz Cebey vs Angel Marcos Garcia Ruiz Fuentes encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Sicilian Defense: Closed.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Ricardo Munoz Cebey vs Angel Marcos Garcia Ruiz Fuentes?
Ricardo Munoz Cebey vs Angel Marcos Garcia Ruiz Fuentes (2012) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Ricardo Munoz Cebey vs Angel Marcos Garcia Ruiz Fuentes?
The game opened with the Sicilian Defense: Closed (ECO B26).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Ricardo Munoz Cebey vs Angel Marcos Garcia Ruiz Fuentes, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.