Amanda Maria Muniz Guevara vs Diego Enrique Lemus Morales
2018 · Result 0–1 · Four Knights Game (C47).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Amanda Maria Muniz Guevara vs Diego Enrique Lemus Morales with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Amanda Maria Muniz Guevara (2001)
- Black
- Diego Enrique Lemus Morales (2030)
- Result
- 0–1
- Year
- 2018
- Opening
- Four Knights Game (C47)
About this chess game
This chess game between Amanda Maria Muniz Guevara (2001) and Diego Enrique Lemus Morales (2030) was played in 2018 and finished 0–1. The opening was the Four Knights Game (C47). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Amanda Maria Muniz Guevara games or Diego Enrique Lemus Morales games? This Amanda Maria Muniz Guevara vs Diego Enrique Lemus Morales encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Four Knights Game.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Amanda Maria Muniz Guevara vs Diego Enrique Lemus Morales?
Amanda Maria Muniz Guevara vs Diego Enrique Lemus Morales (2018) finished 0–1, a win for Diego Enrique Lemus Morales.
What opening was played in Amanda Maria Muniz Guevara vs Diego Enrique Lemus Morales?
The game opened with the Four Knights Game (ECO C47).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Amanda Maria Muniz Guevara vs Diego Enrique Lemus Morales, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.