Scott Mulligan vs Tom O`Gorman
Irish Clubs 2019, 2019 · Result 0–1 · Sicilian Defense: Scheveningen Variation, Classical Variation (B84).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Scott Mulligan vs Tom O`Gorman with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Scott Mulligan (2006)
- Black
- Tom O`Gorman (2241)
- Result
- 0–1
- Event
- Irish Clubs 2019
- Year
- 2019
- Opening
- Sicilian Defense: Scheveningen Variation, Classical Variation (B84)
About this chess game
This chess game between Scott Mulligan (2006) and Tom O`Gorman (2241) was played at Irish Clubs 2019 in 2019 and finished 0–1. The opening was the Sicilian Defense: Scheveningen Variation, Classical Variation (B84). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Scott Mulligan games or Tom O`Gorman games? This Scott Mulligan vs Tom O`Gorman encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Sicilian Defense: Scheveningen Variation, Classical Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Scott Mulligan vs Tom O`Gorman?
Scott Mulligan vs Tom O`Gorman (2019) finished 0–1, a win for Tom O`Gorman.
What opening was played in Scott Mulligan vs Tom O`Gorman?
The game opened with the Sicilian Defense: Scheveningen Variation, Classical Variation (ECO B84).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Scott Mulligan vs Tom O`Gorman, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.