Razit Mukhamadeev vs Anzama Sharapova
2011 · Result 1–0 · Sicilian Defense: Classical Variation, Anti-Sozin Variation (B57).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Razit Mukhamadeev vs Anzama Sharapova with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Razit Mukhamadeev (2089)
- Black
- Anzama Sharapova (2013)
- Result
- 1–0
- Year
- 2011
- Opening
- Sicilian Defense: Classical Variation, Anti-Sozin Variation (B57)
About this chess game
This chess game between Razit Mukhamadeev (2089) and Anzama Sharapova (2013) was played in 2011 and finished 1–0. The opening was the Sicilian Defense: Classical Variation, Anti-Sozin Variation (B57). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Razit Mukhamadeev games or Anzama Sharapova games? This Razit Mukhamadeev vs Anzama Sharapova encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Sicilian Defense: Classical Variation, Anti-Sozin Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Razit Mukhamadeev vs Anzama Sharapova?
Razit Mukhamadeev vs Anzama Sharapova (2011) finished 1–0, a win for Razit Mukhamadeev.
What opening was played in Razit Mukhamadeev vs Anzama Sharapova?
The game opened with the Sicilian Defense: Classical Variation, Anti-Sozin Variation (ECO B57).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Razit Mukhamadeev vs Anzama Sharapova, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.