Kai-Markus, Dr. Mueller vs Stefan Haeussler
date unknown · Result 1–0 · Slav Defense: Exchange Variation, Symmetrical Line (D14).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Kai-Markus, Dr. Mueller vs Stefan Haeussler with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Kai-Markus, Dr. Mueller (2179)
- Black
- Stefan Haeussler (1961)
- Result
- 1–0
- Opening
- Slav Defense: Exchange Variation, Symmetrical Line (D14)
About this chess game
This chess game between Kai-Markus, Dr. Mueller (2179) and Stefan Haeussler (1961) was played and finished 1–0. The opening was the Slav Defense: Exchange Variation, Symmetrical Line (D14). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Kai-Markus, Dr. Mueller games or Stefan Haeussler games? This Kai-Markus, Dr. Mueller vs Stefan Haeussler encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Slav Defense: Exchange Variation, Symmetrical Line.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Kai-Markus, Dr. Mueller vs Stefan Haeussler?
Kai-Markus, Dr. Mueller vs Stefan Haeussler finished 1–0, a win for Kai-Markus, Dr. Mueller.
What opening was played in Kai-Markus, Dr. Mueller vs Stefan Haeussler?
The game opened with the Slav Defense: Exchange Variation, Symmetrical Line (ECO D14).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Kai-Markus, Dr. Mueller vs Stefan Haeussler, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.