Elias Moyses Sobrinho vs Camila Ferreira De Macedo
2016 · Result ½–½ · French Defense: Exchange Variation (C01).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Elias Moyses Sobrinho vs Camila Ferreira De Macedo with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Elias Moyses Sobrinho (1950)
- Black
- Camila Ferreira De Macedo (1687)
- Result
- ½–½
- Year
- 2016
- Opening
- French Defense: Exchange Variation (C01)
About this chess game
This chess game between Elias Moyses Sobrinho (1950) and Camila Ferreira De Macedo (1687) was played in 2016 and finished ½–½. The opening was the French Defense: Exchange Variation (C01). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Elias Moyses Sobrinho games or Camila Ferreira De Macedo games? This Elias Moyses Sobrinho vs Camila Ferreira De Macedo encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the French Defense: Exchange Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Elias Moyses Sobrinho vs Camila Ferreira De Macedo?
Elias Moyses Sobrinho vs Camila Ferreira De Macedo (2016) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Elias Moyses Sobrinho vs Camila Ferreira De Macedo?
The game opened with the French Defense: Exchange Variation (ECO C01).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Elias Moyses Sobrinho vs Camila Ferreira De Macedo, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.