Eduardo Eugenio Chaves Moura vs Jerred Fokkema
CAN-op, 2009 · Result ½–½ · Sicilian Defense: Modern Variations (B50).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Eduardo Eugenio Chaves Moura vs Jerred Fokkema with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Eduardo Eugenio Chaves Moura (2222)
- Black
- Jerred Fokkema (1864)
- Result
- ½–½
- Event
- CAN-op
- Year
- 2009
- Opening
- Sicilian Defense: Modern Variations (B50)
About this chess game
This chess game between Eduardo Eugenio Chaves Moura (2222) and Jerred Fokkema (1864) was played at CAN-op in 2009 and finished ½–½. The opening was the Sicilian Defense: Modern Variations (B50). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Eduardo Eugenio Chaves Moura games or Jerred Fokkema games? This Eduardo Eugenio Chaves Moura vs Jerred Fokkema encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Sicilian Defense: Modern Variations.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Eduardo Eugenio Chaves Moura vs Jerred Fokkema?
Eduardo Eugenio Chaves Moura vs Jerred Fokkema (2009) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Eduardo Eugenio Chaves Moura vs Jerred Fokkema?
The game opened with the Sicilian Defense: Modern Variations (ECO B50).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Eduardo Eugenio Chaves Moura vs Jerred Fokkema, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.