Miguel Mosquera vs Faber Alberto Narvaez Ramirez
Bogota COL, McGREGOR Open 2010, 2010 · Result 1–0 · Petrov's Defense (C42).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Miguel Mosquera vs Faber Alberto Narvaez Ramirez with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Miguel Mosquera (2386)
- Black
- Faber Alberto Narvaez Ramirez (2153)
- Result
- 1–0
- Event
- Bogota COL, McGREGOR Open 2010
- Year
- 2010
- Opening
- Petrov's Defense (C42)
About this chess game
This chess game between Miguel Mosquera (2386) and Faber Alberto Narvaez Ramirez (2153) was played at Bogota COL, McGREGOR Open 2010 in 2010 and finished 1–0. The opening was the Petrov's Defense (C42). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Miguel Mosquera games or Faber Alberto Narvaez Ramirez games? This Miguel Mosquera vs Faber Alberto Narvaez Ramirez encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Petrov's Defense.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Miguel Mosquera vs Faber Alberto Narvaez Ramirez?
Miguel Mosquera vs Faber Alberto Narvaez Ramirez (2010) finished 1–0, a win for Miguel Mosquera.
What opening was played in Miguel Mosquera vs Faber Alberto Narvaez Ramirez?
The game opened with the Petrov's Defense (ECO C42).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Miguel Mosquera vs Faber Alberto Narvaez Ramirez, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.