Viktor Moskalenko vs Lazaro Lorenzo De La Riva
80. Anniversary Mollet GM, 2011 · Result 0–1 · King's Indian Defense (E61).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Viktor Moskalenko vs Lazaro Lorenzo De La Riva with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Viktor Moskalenko (2066)
- Black
- Lazaro Lorenzo De La Riva (2380)
- Result
- 0–1
- Event
- 80. Anniversary Mollet GM
- Year
- 2011
- Opening
- King's Indian Defense (E61)
About this chess game
This chess game between Viktor Moskalenko (2066) and Lazaro Lorenzo De La Riva (2380) was played at 80. Anniversary Mollet GM in 2011 and finished 0–1. The opening was the King's Indian Defense (E61). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Viktor Moskalenko games or Lazaro Lorenzo De La Riva games? This Viktor Moskalenko vs Lazaro Lorenzo De La Riva encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the King's Indian Defense.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Viktor Moskalenko vs Lazaro Lorenzo De La Riva?
Viktor Moskalenko vs Lazaro Lorenzo De La Riva (2011) finished 0–1, a win for Lazaro Lorenzo De La Riva.
What opening was played in Viktor Moskalenko vs Lazaro Lorenzo De La Riva?
The game opened with the King's Indian Defense (ECO E61).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Viktor Moskalenko vs Lazaro Lorenzo De La Riva, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.