Rogvi Mortensen vs Kari Petersen
TCh-FAI 2017-18, 2018 · Result 1–0 · King's Indian Defense: Sämisch Variation, Panno Main Line (E84).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Rogvi Mortensen vs Kari Petersen with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Rogvi Mortensen (1992)
- Black
- Kari Petersen (1902)
- Result
- 1–0
- Event
- TCh-FAI 2017-18
- Year
- 2018
- Opening
- King's Indian Defense: Sämisch Variation, Panno Main Line (E84)
About this chess game
This chess game between Rogvi Mortensen (1992) and Kari Petersen (1902) was played at TCh-FAI 2017-18 in 2018 and finished 1–0. The opening was the King's Indian Defense: Sämisch Variation, Panno Main Line (E84). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Rogvi Mortensen games or Kari Petersen games? This Rogvi Mortensen vs Kari Petersen encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the King's Indian Defense: Sämisch Variation, Panno Main Line.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Rogvi Mortensen vs Kari Petersen?
Rogvi Mortensen vs Kari Petersen (2018) finished 1–0, a win for Rogvi Mortensen.
What opening was played in Rogvi Mortensen vs Kari Petersen?
The game opened with the King's Indian Defense: Sämisch Variation, Panno Main Line (ECO E84).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Rogvi Mortensen vs Kari Petersen, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.