Nicolas Moreno Bolanos vs Camilo Corredor Castellanos
2014 · Result 0–1 · Slav Defense: Modern Line (D11).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Nicolas Moreno Bolanos vs Camilo Corredor Castellanos with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Nicolas Moreno Bolanos (1475)
- Black
- Camilo Corredor Castellanos (1914)
- Result
- 0–1
- Year
- 2014
- Opening
- Slav Defense: Modern Line (D11)
About this chess game
This chess game between Nicolas Moreno Bolanos (1475) and Camilo Corredor Castellanos (1914) was played in 2014 and finished 0–1. The opening was the Slav Defense: Modern Line (D11). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Nicolas Moreno Bolanos games or Camilo Corredor Castellanos games? This Nicolas Moreno Bolanos vs Camilo Corredor Castellanos encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Slav Defense: Modern Line.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Nicolas Moreno Bolanos vs Camilo Corredor Castellanos?
Nicolas Moreno Bolanos vs Camilo Corredor Castellanos (2014) finished 0–1, a win for Camilo Corredor Castellanos.
What opening was played in Nicolas Moreno Bolanos vs Camilo Corredor Castellanos?
The game opened with the Slav Defense: Modern Line (ECO D11).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Nicolas Moreno Bolanos vs Camilo Corredor Castellanos, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.