Jorge Moran Soria vs Esteve Giro Castellet
2012 · Result 1–0 · Queen's Gambit Declined: Queen's Knight Variation (D31).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Jorge Moran Soria vs Esteve Giro Castellet with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Jorge Moran Soria (1797)
- Black
- Esteve Giro Castellet (1614)
- Result
- 1–0
- Year
- 2012
- Opening
- Queen's Gambit Declined: Queen's Knight Variation (D31)
About this chess game
This chess game between Jorge Moran Soria (1797) and Esteve Giro Castellet (1614) was played in 2012 and finished 1–0. The opening was the Queen's Gambit Declined: Queen's Knight Variation (D31). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Jorge Moran Soria games or Esteve Giro Castellet games? This Jorge Moran Soria vs Esteve Giro Castellet encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Queen's Gambit Declined: Queen's Knight Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Jorge Moran Soria vs Esteve Giro Castellet?
Jorge Moran Soria vs Esteve Giro Castellet (2012) finished 1–0, a win for Jorge Moran Soria.
What opening was played in Jorge Moran Soria vs Esteve Giro Castellet?
The game opened with the Queen's Gambit Declined: Queen's Knight Variation (ECO D31).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Jorge Moran Soria vs Esteve Giro Castellet, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.