Raul Morales Barrera vs Antonio Prados Montano
39. Seville Open 2014, 2014 · Result 0–1 · Queen's Gambit Declined: Chigorin Defense (D07).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Raul Morales Barrera vs Antonio Prados Montano with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Raul Morales Barrera (2053)
- Black
- Antonio Prados Montano (2240)
- Result
- 0–1
- Event
- 39. Seville Open 2014
- Year
- 2014
- Opening
- Queen's Gambit Declined: Chigorin Defense (D07)
About this chess game
This chess game between Raul Morales Barrera (2053) and Antonio Prados Montano (2240) was played at 39. Seville Open 2014 in 2014 and finished 0–1. The opening was the Queen's Gambit Declined: Chigorin Defense (D07). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Raul Morales Barrera games or Antonio Prados Montano games? This Raul Morales Barrera vs Antonio Prados Montano encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Queen's Gambit Declined: Chigorin Defense.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Raul Morales Barrera vs Antonio Prados Montano?
Raul Morales Barrera vs Antonio Prados Montano (2014) finished 0–1, a win for Antonio Prados Montano.
What opening was played in Raul Morales Barrera vs Antonio Prados Montano?
The game opened with the Queen's Gambit Declined: Chigorin Defense (ECO D07).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Raul Morales Barrera vs Antonio Prados Montano, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.