Paulo Jorge De Morais vs Joao Pedro Gomes Ferreira
2006 · Result ½–½ · Sicilian Defense: McDonnell Attack (B21).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Paulo Jorge De Morais vs Joao Pedro Gomes Ferreira with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Paulo Jorge De Morais (1915)
- Black
- Joao Pedro Gomes Ferreira (1663)
- Result
- ½–½
- Year
- 2006
- Opening
- Sicilian Defense: McDonnell Attack (B21)
About this chess game
This chess game between Paulo Jorge De Morais (1915) and Joao Pedro Gomes Ferreira (1663) was played in 2006 and finished ½–½. The opening was the Sicilian Defense: McDonnell Attack (B21). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Paulo Jorge De Morais games or Joao Pedro Gomes Ferreira games? This Paulo Jorge De Morais vs Joao Pedro Gomes Ferreira encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Sicilian Defense: McDonnell Attack.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Paulo Jorge De Morais vs Joao Pedro Gomes Ferreira?
Paulo Jorge De Morais vs Joao Pedro Gomes Ferreira (2006) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Paulo Jorge De Morais vs Joao Pedro Gomes Ferreira?
The game opened with the Sicilian Defense: McDonnell Attack (ECO B21).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Paulo Jorge De Morais vs Joao Pedro Gomes Ferreira, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.