Javier Morais Carreras vs Antonio Castaneda Munoz
2019 · Result 1–0 · Sicilian Defense: Moscow Variation (B51).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Javier Morais Carreras vs Antonio Castaneda Munoz with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Javier Morais Carreras (1864)
- Black
- Antonio Castaneda Munoz (1615)
- Result
- 1–0
- Year
- 2019
- Opening
- Sicilian Defense: Moscow Variation (B51)
About this chess game
This chess game between Javier Morais Carreras (1864) and Antonio Castaneda Munoz (1615) was played in 2019 and finished 1–0. The opening was the Sicilian Defense: Moscow Variation (B51). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Javier Morais Carreras games or Antonio Castaneda Munoz games? This Javier Morais Carreras vs Antonio Castaneda Munoz encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Sicilian Defense: Moscow Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Javier Morais Carreras vs Antonio Castaneda Munoz?
Javier Morais Carreras vs Antonio Castaneda Munoz (2019) finished 1–0, a win for Javier Morais Carreras.
What opening was played in Javier Morais Carreras vs Antonio Castaneda Munoz?
The game opened with the Sicilian Defense: Moscow Variation (ECO B51).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Javier Morais Carreras vs Antonio Castaneda Munoz, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.