Roger Moor vs Rene Tueckmantel
Zurich Korchnoi Open 2017, 2017 · Result 1–0 · English Opening: Symmetrical Variation, Normal Variation (A34).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Roger Moor vs Rene Tueckmantel with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Roger Moor (2397)
- Black
- Rene Tueckmantel (2156)
- Result
- 1–0
- Event
- Zurich Korchnoi Open 2017
- Year
- 2017
- Opening
- English Opening: Symmetrical Variation, Normal Variation (A34)
About this chess game
This chess game between Roger Moor (2397) and Rene Tueckmantel (2156) was played at Zurich Korchnoi Open 2017 in 2017 and finished 1–0. The opening was the English Opening: Symmetrical Variation, Normal Variation (A34). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Roger Moor games or Rene Tueckmantel games? This Roger Moor vs Rene Tueckmantel encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the English Opening: Symmetrical Variation, Normal Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Roger Moor vs Rene Tueckmantel?
Roger Moor vs Rene Tueckmantel (2017) finished 1–0, a win for Roger Moor.
What opening was played in Roger Moor vs Rene Tueckmantel?
The game opened with the English Opening: Symmetrical Variation, Normal Variation (ECO A34).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Roger Moor vs Rene Tueckmantel, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.