Jose Andres Montesdeoca Arteta vs Francisco Perez Romano
2011 · Result ½–½ · Sicilian Defense: Open (B32).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Jose Andres Montesdeoca Arteta vs Francisco Perez Romano with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Jose Andres Montesdeoca Arteta (1509)
- Black
- Francisco Perez Romano (1767)
- Result
- ½–½
- Year
- 2011
- Opening
- Sicilian Defense: Open (B32)
About this chess game
This chess game between Jose Andres Montesdeoca Arteta (1509) and Francisco Perez Romano (1767) was played in 2011 and finished ½–½. The opening was the Sicilian Defense: Open (B32). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Jose Andres Montesdeoca Arteta games or Francisco Perez Romano games? This Jose Andres Montesdeoca Arteta vs Francisco Perez Romano encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Sicilian Defense: Open.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Jose Andres Montesdeoca Arteta vs Francisco Perez Romano?
Jose Andres Montesdeoca Arteta vs Francisco Perez Romano (2011) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Jose Andres Montesdeoca Arteta vs Francisco Perez Romano?
The game opened with the Sicilian Defense: Open (ECO B32).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Jose Andres Montesdeoca Arteta vs Francisco Perez Romano, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.