Cesidio Rocha Monteiro Neto vs Mateus De Camargo
2011 · Result 1–0 · Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation (B95).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Cesidio Rocha Monteiro Neto vs Mateus De Camargo with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Cesidio Rocha Monteiro Neto (2056)
- Black
- Mateus De Camargo (2072)
- Result
- 1–0
- Year
- 2011
- Opening
- Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation (B95)
About this chess game
This chess game between Cesidio Rocha Monteiro Neto (2056) and Mateus De Camargo (2072) was played in 2011 and finished 1–0. The opening was the Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation (B95). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Cesidio Rocha Monteiro Neto games or Mateus De Camargo games? This Cesidio Rocha Monteiro Neto vs Mateus De Camargo encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Cesidio Rocha Monteiro Neto vs Mateus De Camargo?
Cesidio Rocha Monteiro Neto vs Mateus De Camargo (2011) finished 1–0, a win for Cesidio Rocha Monteiro Neto.
What opening was played in Cesidio Rocha Monteiro Neto vs Mateus De Camargo?
The game opened with the Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation (ECO B95).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Cesidio Rocha Monteiro Neto vs Mateus De Camargo, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.