Alvaro Montanez vs Manuel Santiago Duque Pinzon
date unknown · Result 0–1 · English Opening: King's English Variation (A20).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Alvaro Montanez vs Manuel Santiago Duque Pinzon with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Alvaro Montanez (1895)
- Black
- Manuel Santiago Duque Pinzon (2061)
- Result
- 0–1
- Opening
- English Opening: King's English Variation (A20)
About this chess game
This chess game between Alvaro Montanez (1895) and Manuel Santiago Duque Pinzon (2061) was played and finished 0–1. The opening was the English Opening: King's English Variation (A20). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Alvaro Montanez games or Manuel Santiago Duque Pinzon games? This Alvaro Montanez vs Manuel Santiago Duque Pinzon encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the English Opening: King's English Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Alvaro Montanez vs Manuel Santiago Duque Pinzon?
Alvaro Montanez vs Manuel Santiago Duque Pinzon finished 0–1, a win for Manuel Santiago Duque Pinzon.
What opening was played in Alvaro Montanez vs Manuel Santiago Duque Pinzon?
The game opened with the English Opening: King's English Variation (ECO A20).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Alvaro Montanez vs Manuel Santiago Duque Pinzon, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.