Claudio Monreal Vargas vs Gonzalo Cabezas Tisnado
2009 · Result 1–0 · Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation (B22).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Claudio Monreal Vargas vs Gonzalo Cabezas Tisnado with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Claudio Monreal Vargas (2027)
- Black
- Gonzalo Cabezas Tisnado (1877)
- Result
- 1–0
- Year
- 2009
- Opening
- Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation (B22)
About this chess game
This chess game between Claudio Monreal Vargas (2027) and Gonzalo Cabezas Tisnado (1877) was played in 2009 and finished 1–0. The opening was the Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation (B22). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Claudio Monreal Vargas games or Gonzalo Cabezas Tisnado games? This Claudio Monreal Vargas vs Gonzalo Cabezas Tisnado encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Claudio Monreal Vargas vs Gonzalo Cabezas Tisnado?
Claudio Monreal Vargas vs Gonzalo Cabezas Tisnado (2009) finished 1–0, a win for Claudio Monreal Vargas.
What opening was played in Claudio Monreal Vargas vs Gonzalo Cabezas Tisnado?
The game opened with the Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation (ECO B22).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Claudio Monreal Vargas vs Gonzalo Cabezas Tisnado, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.