Laszlo Molnar vs Miklos Gyurkovics
2017 · Result 0–1 · King's Indian Defense: Fianchetto Variation, Classical Fianchetto (E67).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Laszlo Molnar vs Miklos Gyurkovics with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Laszlo Molnar (2147)
- Black
- Miklos Gyurkovics (2105)
- Result
- 0–1
- Year
- 2017
- Opening
- King's Indian Defense: Fianchetto Variation, Classical Fianchetto (E67)
About this chess game
This chess game between Laszlo Molnar (2147) and Miklos Gyurkovics (2105) was played in 2017 and finished 0–1. The opening was the King's Indian Defense: Fianchetto Variation, Classical Fianchetto (E67). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Laszlo Molnar games or Miklos Gyurkovics games? This Laszlo Molnar vs Miklos Gyurkovics encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the King's Indian Defense: Fianchetto Variation, Classical Fianchetto.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Laszlo Molnar vs Miklos Gyurkovics?
Laszlo Molnar vs Miklos Gyurkovics (2017) finished 0–1, a win for Miklos Gyurkovics.
What opening was played in Laszlo Molnar vs Miklos Gyurkovics?
The game opened with the King's Indian Defense: Fianchetto Variation, Classical Fianchetto (ECO E67).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Laszlo Molnar vs Miklos Gyurkovics, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.