Robert Mollet vs Ulrike Storkebaum
2006 · Result 0–1 · Italian Game: Two Knights Defense, Polerio Defense, Suhle Defense (C59).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Robert Mollet vs Ulrike Storkebaum with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Robert Mollet (1853)
- Black
- Ulrike Storkebaum (1934)
- Result
- 0–1
- Year
- 2006
- Opening
- Italian Game: Two Knights Defense, Polerio Defense, Suhle Defense (C59)
About this chess game
This chess game between Robert Mollet (1853) and Ulrike Storkebaum (1934) was played in 2006 and finished 0–1. The opening was the Italian Game: Two Knights Defense, Polerio Defense, Suhle Defense (C59). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Robert Mollet games or Ulrike Storkebaum games? This Robert Mollet vs Ulrike Storkebaum encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Italian Game: Two Knights Defense, Polerio Defense, Suhle Defense.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Robert Mollet vs Ulrike Storkebaum?
Robert Mollet vs Ulrike Storkebaum (2006) finished 0–1, a win for Ulrike Storkebaum.
What opening was played in Robert Mollet vs Ulrike Storkebaum?
The game opened with the Italian Game: Two Knights Defense, Polerio Defense, Suhle Defense (ECO C59).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Robert Mollet vs Ulrike Storkebaum, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.